A few weeks ago, I had a conversation with a friend at work who writes fiction on the side. During the conversation, she said, "I'd rather write something lasting than popular."
I took it to heart for a few days and thought, 'Yeah, that's the ticket.' But now I'm backtracking. The question I find myself posing is, 'what is lasting?'
Is Beloved by Toni Morrison lasting? Underworld by Don Delileo? According to the critics, they are. Those are considered to be some of the best works in literature in the last 30 years. But I've never read them. Don't even want to really. I picked up Underworld a few weeks ago and tried reading it because it had been hailed as the masterpiece of the last 50 years. It was written well. No doubt about it. It was interesting. But it was boring and I put it down.
How many people know Don Delileo except the high brow circles?
But if you are going to talk about lasting, is Riders of the Purple Sage lasting? The Maltese Falcon? The Day of the Jackal? These are all books written in the popular genre, but I would bet my bottom dollar they are just as lasting and well known, if not even more well known than the two previous literary fiction books I just mentioned. One hundred years from now, I'd like to know if more people know about Patriot Games by Tom Clancy, The Stand by Stephen King or A Time to Kill by John Grisham than they do about Beloved, Underworld or Gravity's Rainbow by Thomas Pynchon.
I'm starting to wonder if the days of literary fiction are gone. Maybe the real literary fiction lies in the popular fiction the critics want to rail about. There is insight to be found in an Elmore Leonard novel, in a Micheal Connelly book and a John Grisham thriller. They are written just as well as the so called "masters" with terse prose and storylines that take readers on adventures. Say what you want, their is social commentary as well. Grisham examined race in A Time to Kill. Dan Brown examines religion in his books. Michael Crichton examines and has examined a variety of disasters we should be prepared for, long before Hurricane Katrina.
Maybe the writers have it right. It certainly doesn't seem like the so-called "critics" do.